09 Dec

Land Reforms (DAMP)

 

< Free Damp Home Page

Contents

• Highlight the key reforms undertaken by the government to bring tenancy reforms. What are the limitations in implementing tenancy reforms.
• Discuss the challenges faced in implementing the Zamindari abolition policy in India. How successful was it in its objective of land distribution?
• Explain the reasons behind the implementation of land reforms in India after independence. Discuss the objectives of land reform and the measures taken to achieve them.

---

05-07-2023

Q: Highlight the key reforms undertaken by the government to bring tenancy reforms. What are the limitations in implementing tenancy reforms. (15 Marks, 250 Words)

For Answer Submission Please Join the Telegram Group: Click here to join the Group

Answer :

The Indian government has undertaken key reforms to address tenancy issues, aiming to protect the rights of tenant farmers and ensure land redistribution, social justice and reduce inequality.

Key Reforms:

• Rent Regulation: In the pre-independent India, exorbitant rent was extracted from tenants. In the country, the rent varied from 34 to 75%.
• Reduction in Rent: The first five-year plan stated that maximum rent should be fixed at 1/4th or 1/5th of the total product. Except in Punjab, Haryana, J&K, TN and Andhra Pradesh, this limit was observed in all the states. Even in these states, it didn’t go beyond 40%.
• Security of Tenure: To protect tenants from ejectment and grant them permanent rights in land, legislations have been passed in most of the states.
• Legislation for security of tenure had three essential aims:
• No ejection except as per the provision of the law.
• Land may be resumed by the owner, if at all, for ‘personal cultivation’ only
• In the event of ejection, the tenant is assured of a prescribed minimum area.
• Ownership rights for Tenants:
• Some states have also passed laws to confer ownership rights to tenants.
• It is estimated that because of this, 1.2 crore tenants have acquired ownership rights over 6.32 million hectares of land.
• West Bengal, Karnataka, and Kerala have achieved more successes than the other states.
• In Kerala, applications of 24 lakh tenants for conferment of ownership rights were accepted.
• Support for sharecroppers: Special provisions have been made to provide legal recognition and support to sharecroppers, ensuring they have access to credit, government schemes, and agricultural inputs.
• In West Bengal, 14 lakh sharecroppers have been recorded under the ‘Operation Barga’.
• Contract farming regulations: The government has introduced guidelines and regulations to safeguard the interests of farmers entering into contractual agreements with agribusiness companies, ensuring fair terms and protection against exploitation.

Limitations in implementing tenancy reforms:

• Overall, the progress was very unsatisfactory.
• A few states didn’t adopt legislation while in some others implementation has been very poor.
• Weak enforcement mechanisms and inadequate monitoring undermine the effective implementation of tenancy reforms.
• Powerful landlords and intermediaries often resist the implementation of tenancy reforms, as it may impact their economic interests and control over land.
• Cumbersome legal processes and lengthy litigation procedures made it difficult for tenant farmers to seek legal recourse and protect their rights.
• Deep-rooted social norms, customs, and power dynamics limit the effectiveness of tenancy reforms.
• For a long period, tenant didn’t exercise their rights to purchase ownership of land they cultivated due to following reasons:
• Many tenants couldn’t afford to pay the purchase price.
• Many tenants were unwilling to purchase. This reflected the dominant controlling power of the landowner’s vis-a-vis the tenants.

The government’s efforts in implementing tenancy reforms have included enacting legislation, providing legal recognition to sharecroppers, and regulating contract farming. Despite limitations, such reforms hold the potential to empower tenant farmers, enhance agricultural productivity, and promote social and economic equity in the farming sector.

04-07-2023

Q: Discuss the challenges faced in implementing the Zamindari abolition policy in India. How successful was it in its objective of land distribution? (15 Marks, 250 Words)

Answer :

Even before independence it was understood that exploitation by zamindars is the main cause of stagnation in India’s agriculture which in turn was the main reason behind stagnation in Agri-growth. So, some states had passed laws to abolish the zamindari system, but the primary work related to this was done during the first five-year plan.

Outcome:

• Official documents claimed that intermediaries were completely abolished by the end of the First Plan excepting a few small pockets in some areas.
• It is estimated that in all 173 million acres of land was acquired from the intermediaries and, consequently, about 2 crore tenants were brought into direct relationship with the state.

Assessment:

• Challenges:
• Delays: Due to delay in making of laws (for e.g. UP Zamindari Abolition act, took 4.5 years) and then due to Zamindar’s challenging it in court.
• Flaws in legislations:
• The “Personal Cultivation” provision was misused. Zamindars could obtain land for ‘personal cultivation’ upto a ceiling limit. The zamindars could even evict tenants for the purpose.
• “Ceilings were very high” -> very few zamindars were affected.
• Transfer of land to family members: Flaws in the legislation have also enabled them to transfer their land to other members of their families and thus escape the ceiling law.
• Zamindari only changed its ‘garb’: The previous zamindars acquired large areas for personal cultivation on which cultivation is done with the help of hired agricultural labor. They are now designated as ‘big landowners’ and along with rich peasantry, have formed “a new and dominant class of rural capitalist”.

• Positives
• Most of the states had passed zamindari abolition law by the end of the first five-year plan. This perhaps reflected on the popular sentiments against zamindars and their exploitative practices.
• Exploitation and oppression of tenants and actual tillers of the soil declined steeply, and the feudal rural structure crumbled.
• Reforms led to skimming of great absentee landlords.
• Land reforms measures in Kerala (1959) and West Bengal (1967) are particularly significant.
• In Kerala, the government declared eviction illegal, and sharecroppers were granted the right to purchase land. They were not allowed to retain more than 10 acres of land.
• The United Front Government of West Bengal acted decisively in favor of the bargardars and agricultural workers and against landlords and rich farmers.

Overall, while the policy marked an important step towards reducing economic inequality and rural poverty, its implementation was marred by several challenges, and its success was uneven across the country. For the policy to achieve its objectives fully, these challenges needed to be, and still need to be, addressed more effectively.

03-07-2023

Q: Explain the reasons behind the implementation of land reforms in India after independence. Discuss the objectives of land reform and the measures taken to achieve them. (15 Marks, 250 Words)

Answer :

After gaining independence, India implemented land reforms to address historical injustices, alleviate rural poverty, promote social equity, and enhance agricultural productivity.

Need of Land Reforms in India after Independence:

The exploitative nature of land tenure system (Zamindari and Ryotwari system) prevailing during the pre-independence period:

• Under Zamindari System:
• High rent: As much as 25% of produce was taken away by the intermediaries in the form of rent.
• Illegal extraction: Encroachment of communal rights in pastures, forests, etc and the farmers were made to pay for accessing these.
• Begar and force labor were common: Other than high rent and illegal extractions, farmers were also forced by zamindars into forced labor.
• Low capital investment: Low income for famers led to lack of investment in agriculture, low capital intensity and antiquated methods -> stagnant productivity.
• Poor records maintenance: It led to difficulty in mortgaging and selling of land. It also led to poor development of credit institutions in these areas.
• Even under Ryotwari system where rent was directly paid by Ryots (cultivators) to government, several shortcomings had developed. Here, moneylenders and Mahajans had come to play a very important role. By the time of independence, more than 20% of the area under cultivation had passed under open tenancy.

Objectives of Land Reforms:

• Remove impediments to Agri production that derives from agrarian structures inherited from the past.
• To eliminate all forms of exploitation and social injustice within the agrarian system, to provide security for the tiller of soil and assure equality of status and opportunity to all sections of the rural population.
• Redistributing land: The main objective of land reform was to redistribute land from large landowners to landless and small farmers, thereby reducing inequalities in land ownership.
• Ensuring land tenure security: Land reforms aimed to provide secure land tenure rights to farmers, protecting them from eviction and ensuring their long-term investment in land.

Measures taken to achieve the above objectives were:

• Abolition of intermediaries: Abolishment of Zamindars and bringing farmers in direct contact with state
• Tenancy Reforms: It included regulation of rent, security of tenure and ownership rights of tenants.
• Ceilings on Agricultural Landholdings: So that access land could be redistributed.
• Reorganization of Agriculture: Redistribution of land, consolidation of land holding and cooperative farming.

Despite various implementation challenges, these land reforms significantly contributed to rural poverty reduction, and social equity in India, thus underlining the importance of land reforms in advancing the socio-economic conditions of marginal and small farmers.

22-06-2023

Q: Discuss the challenges faced by farmers in marketing their agricultural produce in India. Suggest measures to improve Agri-marketing infrastructure and reduce post-harvest losses. (15 Marks, 250 words)

Answer :

Agri-marketing refers to the process of promoting, selling, and distributing agricultural products, including crops, livestock, and related inputs. It involves activities such as market research, pricing, branding, packaging, advertising, and establishing efficient supply chains to connect farmers with consumers and other market participants.

Efficient Agri-marketing is crucial for:

• Ensuring proper prices for farmers: Promotes and sustains agricultural production and productivity -> food security and inclusive growth.
• Lower prices for consumers: Efficient marketing mechanisms reduce the cost of transaction and share of intermediaries.
• Stimulating Agro-based and food processing industrial growth: Ensures affordable availability of raw material for Agro-based industries.
• Reduced subsidy burden for government: Efficient marketing will reduce the need of procurement by government from MSP.

Challenges faced by farmers in marketing their agricultural produce:

• Limited market access: Farmers struggle to reach distant markets due to inadequate transportation infrastructure and connectivity.
• Price volatility: Farmers face unpredictable price fluctuations, leading to income instability and financial insecurity.
• Middleman exploitation: Farmers often rely on intermediaries who exploit their lack of bargaining power, resulting in unfair prices.
• Inefficient value chains: Poor integration between farmers, processors, and retailers leads to wastage, delays, and reduced profitability.
• Inadequate storage and post-harvest facilities: Insufficient storage infrastructure and post-harvest losses diminish farmers’ profits and marketable quantities.
• Inadequate market infrastructure: Lack of proper market yards, cold storage, and processing facilities restrict farmers’ access to quality markets.

Way Forward

• Reform APMCS (responsibility of states): Incentivize states to adopt and implement features of model laws such as delink the regulatory and operational role of APMCs.
• Link APMC with national e-marketing portal.
• Modernize storage facilities: Upgrade warehouses and cold storage to ensure proper preservation of agricultural produce.
• Enhance transportation networks: Improve Road and rail connectivity for efficient movement of goods from farm to market.
• Invest in processing units: Establish processing facilities to add value to agricultural products and meet market demand for processed goods.
• Support farmer producer organizations: Strengthen FPOs to enable collective marketing, bargaining power, and access to better markets.

Government’s efforts are in right direction to enhance farmers’ access to markets, ensure better price realization, and promote sustainable agricultural practices for the overall development of the sector.