Direct Taxes
< General Studies Home Page
Contents
- Increasing Direct Tax Base
- One Nation One Ration Card
- Taxing Agriculture
- Direct Tax Code (DTC)
- Reduction in Corporate Income Tax
- Global Corporate Minimum Tax
- 2% Global Wealth Tax: To curb Evasion: Suggested by EU Report
- MAT and AMT
- Institutions Dealing with Direct Taxes in India
1) INCREASING DIRECT TAX BASE
- Direct Tax in FY23:
- India’s net direct tax collection have risen by 17.63% in 2022-23 to touch Rs 16.61 lakh crores, as per the data released by Finance Ministry in April 2023.
» It was 14.09 lakh crore in FY22 and 9.41 lakh crores in FY21. - Corporate Tax – Rs 10.04 lakh crores (51.1% of direct tax) and Personal Income Tax and Securities Transaction Tax accounted for Rs 9.61 lakh crores (48.9% of direct tax)
- Even for FY24, situation seems to be good so far:
» Between April 2023 to Aug 2023, the direct tax collection has increased by 26.6%.
- India’s net direct tax collection have risen by 17.63% in 2022-23 to touch Rs 16.61 lakh crores, as per the data released by Finance Ministry in April 2023.
- Current Tax Base:
▫ As per CBDT a total of 7.78 crore/140 crore people have. Filed ITR in FY2023. This is less than 6% of the country’s population.
â–« Though this number is an 100% improvement from the 2013-14 situation when 3.8 crore people filed ITR. - Why is it important to increase the Direct Tax Base?
â–« Fiscal Consolidation
â–« Fights Inequality: Indirect taxes are regressive, but direct taxes are progressive and thus promote equality. Direction taxes also avoid severe distortionary trend of indirect taxes.
â–« Educative Value: Direct tax creates a civic sense among taxpayers. Because money is directly paid by citizens, they become more vigilant of where and how government is spending their money.
â–« Anti-Inflationary: Direct Tax can be considered a good instrument of anti-inflationary fiscal policy.
â–« Reduce pressure on honest taxpayers. - Key Reasons for recent increase in tax base
- Steps to make it difficult to avoid tax:
» Bank accounts linking with PAN and Aadhar.
» Introduction of new data sources in the Statement of Financial Transaction (SFT), such as dividend, interest, details of shares etc has led to jump in reported information, with additional information of about 3 crore persons.
» Expansion of the scope of TDS/TCS: Several new transactions were brought under the ambit of TDS and TCS. - Simplified process through technology:
» Faceless assessment Scheme
» Simplified ITR filing process through a 1-page SAHAJ return process for individual income tax.
» Ease of getting refund, majorly by small and medium taxpayers also have
encouragement more filing of ITRs. - Steps towards formalization of economy:
» Initiatives like Pradhan Mantri Formalization of Micro Food Processing Enterprises (PMFME) - Steps to expand digital payment system (Demonetization, UPI etc.)
- Streamlining of GST system
» It has reduced the scope of evasion of direct taxes.
- Steps to make it difficult to avoid tax:
- The above growth is still not good enough and the tax base is very low (only 7.78 crore people filing FIR)
- Key factors for low tax base
- Complex Law
â–« Income Tax Act 1961 isn’t suitable for current scenarios. It has become very complex and has thus reduced compliance.
â–« This complicated structure is difficult to understand for individuals/corporate sector. Plethora of exemptions and deductions, adding to litigation on these, needs to be removed.
â–« High compliance cost - High Rates are recipe for low tax compliance.
â–« Personal income tax rates are very high leading to high rates of evasion. - Poor Tax Administration
â–« A lot of tax evaders go scot-free.
â–« Income Tax department doesn’t have resources to deal with small tax evaders
â–« Corruption is rampant in income tax department
â–« Complaints of harassment by tax officials. - Large Informal Sector: This sector doesn’t effectively get covered under tax regime.
- Agriculture-out of tax net (sometimes non-agri income is also presented as agri-income)
- Complex Law
2) ONE NATION ONE RATION CARD
- What is ITR?
» An Income Tax Return (ITR) is a form used to file information about income and tax to the Income tax Department. - Currently, How many kinds of ITR are there?
» Currently, there are seven categories of ITR forms, for different categories of taxpayers.- ITR Form 1, called ‘Sahaj‘ is for small and medium taxpayers. It can be filed by individuals who have an income upto Rs 50 lakh, with earnings from salary, one house property/other sources (interest etc.)
- ITR-2 is filed by people with income from residential property.
- ITR-3 is intended for people who have income as profits from businesses/ profession.
- ITR-4 (Sugam), like ITR-1, is a simple forms, and can be filed by individuals, Hindu
Undivided Family and firms with total income upto Rs 50 lakh from business and
profession. - ITR-5 and ITR-6 are for limited liability partnerships (LLPs) and businesses
- ITR-7 is filed by Trusts and non-profit organizations
- Changes proposed by CBDT:
- All taxpayers (except trusts and non-profit organizations (ITR-7)), will be able to use a common ITR form, which will include a separate head for disclosure of income from virtual digital assets.
- Sahaj (ITR-1) and Sugam (ITR-4) will continue. This will give option to such taxpayers to file the return either in the existing form (ITR-1 or ITR-4), or the proposed common ITR, at their convenience.
- Reasons:
- Simplifying ITR filing system -> Ease of filing returns and Reduced time for filing the ITR
- Taxpayers will not have to see the schedules that don’t apply to them.
- It intends the smart design schedule in a user friendly manner with a better arrangement, logical flow, and increased scope of pre-filling.
- It will also facilitate proper reconciliation of third-party data available with the Income-Tax department vis-a-vis the data to be reported in the ITR to reduce compliance burden on tax payers.
- Making the system in sync with International best practices
- Simplifying ITR filing system -> Ease of filing returns and Reduced time for filing the ITR
3) TAXING AGRICULTURE
- Agriculture Income:
- Agriculture Income is defined under section 2(1A) of the Income Tax Act as:
i. Any rent or revenue from land situated in India and is used for agriculture purpose
ii. Any income derived from such land by agriculture operations including processing of agriculture produce so as to render it fit for the market or sale of such produce.
iii. Any income attributable to farm house subject to satisfaction of certain conditions specified in this regard in section 2(1A).
- Agriculture Income is defined under section 2(1A) of the Income Tax Act as:
- Agriculture income earned by farmers in India is exempt from Income tax. It is provided under Section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
- Past Attempt at taxing agriculture income
» Taxation Enquiry Committee in 1924-25 recommended taxing of farmers.
» DR BR Ambedkar had also favored taxing agri-income based on the income of farmers. He criticized the land revenue system of British but was of the view that income from agriculture must be taxed.
» Wanchoo Committee of 1971 on Direct Taxes also recommended that agriculture income should be done away with and be aggregated with other income liable to income tax as the provision was being used for evading tax.
» KN Raj Committee through its report in 1972 analyzed the feasibility of taxing agriculture and recommended taxing of rich farmers.
» Kelkar task force report in 2002 estimated that 95% of the farmers were below the tax threshold. It also stated that the exemption to agriculture income is a distortion to both horizontal and vertical equity and encourages laundering of non-agriculture income as agriculture income.
» In Short, almost all the commissions and agencies appointed or created by the government in the last 60 years have unanimously been of the view that agriculture income should be subjected to tax.
» In April 2022, the Public Accounts Committee tabled a report in the Parliament on ‘Assessments relating to Agriculture Income’ in which the committee examined certain paragraphs of the CAG report which dealt with verification of documents for exemption, incorrect reflection of income tax etc. - Why agri-income should be taxed?
- Increasing Tax Base
- It will help in formalization of agri activities.
- Ensuring better access to farmers of various government programs
- Avoiding Tax Evasion and Money Laundering: A lot of people claim their non farm income as agri income and evade taxes on them.
4) DIRECT TAX CODE (DTC)
- Intro:
â–« The basic structure of Income Tax Act, 1961 has remained same for the last 61 years. It was drafted in an era when India was closely controlled economy with quasi-socialist mindset. It has not changed much vis-a-vis the changes in the economic scenarios in the country.
â–« The current direct tax structure in India is very complicated. For e.g., the 1961 act has 700+ sections.
â–« This makes compliance difficult for taxpayers and assessment difficult for tax authorities leading to litigations and counter litigations.
â–« The Direct Tax Code is envisaged as a single, simplified, uniform, economically effective and equitable mechanism which will deal with the above challenges. - What does DTC entail?
â–« So far various committees have suggested the following simplification in the direct tax structure:- Single Code for Direct Taxes
- Doing away with cesses and Surcharge
- Reducing Litigations
- Introduction of Negotiated Settlement
- Bringing predictability and Stability in tax regime by including accepted international principles and best practices.
5) REDUCTION IN CORPORATE INCOME TAX
- Corporate tax rates which used to be more than 50% in early 1990s was brought down to 30% by 2004-05 as per the recommendations of Shome Committee (2001) and Kelkar Committee (2002).
- But, even at the basic rate of 30% the effective corporate tax paid by Indian companies was around 35% which was on the higher side compared to its peers.
- This high tax rate led to low investments which reduced economic growth potential.
- So, through Taxation Laws (Amendment) Ordinance following changes were made in Sep 2019.
- Income Tax rate of 22% (Effective 25% with surcharge and cess) for all domestic companies (provided they don’t claim deductions under the Income Tax Act)
- The new rates are applicable for those companies which will not avail any
exemption/incentives.
- The new rates are applicable for those companies which will not avail any
- Domestic manufacturing companies set up on or after Oct 1, 2019, to pay tax at a lower 15% rate (effective 17%) if they forego other incentives.
â–« Note: These companies must start manufacturing before April 1, 2023. - If a company applies for new rates than the same will be applicable in subsequent years.
- Provisions related to Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) will not be applicable for companies choosing new tax rates.
- Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) has been reduced from 18.5% to 15% for companies not choosing the new tax rates.
- Income Tax rate of 22% (Effective 25% with surcharge and cess) for all domestic companies (provided they don’t claim deductions under the Income Tax Act)
- Positive Implications
- India’s tax rates have become on par with competing Asian peers.
- This will increase the profitability of the corporate players and thus will contribute in making India an attractive destination for investment.
- It may also increase the export competitivity of Indian companies.
- Contribute to easy credit availability
- In long run, the enhanced economic activities will increase the tax base and thus may also boost tax collection.
- India’s tax rates have become on par with competing Asian peers.
- Concerns
- Revenue loss and thus increased fiscal deficit in short runs.
- For e.g. recently, finance ministry announced that the government faced a revenue loss of more than 1 lakh crores in FY21.
- Hasn’t kickstarted investment: RBI has recently noted that the new tax regime didn’t kickstart the intended Investment Cycle.
- Revenue loss and thus increased fiscal deficit in short runs.
6) GLOBAL CORPORATE MINIMUM TAX
- Need: The existence of tax havens – Many companies register on these tax havens and evade tax through various mechanisms like round tripping.
- Big companies have an increasing tendency to shift income from tangible sources such as drug patents, software and royalties on intellectual property to these jurisdictions, allowing companies to avoid paying higher taxes in their traditional home countries.
- In Oct 2021, after negotiations at the OECD, more than 130 countries agreed to an outline of Global Minimum Tax Agreement.
- Global Minimum Tax Agreement is aimed:
- Pillar-1: Reallocate taxing rights on about $200 billion in profits from the companies to the countries where they do business (rather than just the home country)
- Implications: US tech companies may have to pay more taxes to governments of developing countries.
- Pillar-2: It establishes the base, rate, and approach for global minimum corporate tax.
- Pillar-1: Reallocate taxing rights on about $200 billion in profits from the companies to the countries where they do business (rather than just the home country)
- Governments are now working on implementation plan and turning the agreement into law.
- How will this work?
- A global minimum tax would apply to overseas profit of multinational firms with 750 million euros in sales globally.
- Governments can still set whatever local corporate tax rate they want, but if companies pay lower rates in a particular country, their home governments would “top up” their tax to the 15% minimum, eliminating the advantage of shifting profits.
- A global minimum tax would apply to overseas profit of multinational firms with 750 million euros in sales globally.
- Advantages:
» Increase in global tax revenue by about $150 billion in additional global tax revenue (OECD)
» Economic Growth: Economists expect that the deal will encourage multinationals to repatriate capital in their country of headquarters, giving boost to these economies.
» End of Race to the Bottom: This has made harder for government to shore up revenues. - Updates:
- In Dec 2022, Members of EU have agreed in principle to implement a minimum tax of 15% on big businesses in accordance with the pillar-2 of the global tax agreement framed by OECD.
7) 2% GLOBAL WEALTH TAX: TO CURB EVASION: SUGGESTED BY EU REPORT
- Report: European Union Tax Observatory has published the report titled ‘Global Tax Evasion Report 2024‘.
- Key Highlights:
» Tax Evasion is enabling billionaires to enjoy effective tax rates equivalent to 0% to 0.5% of their wealth.- The number of people affected by it would be miniscule, the tax rate of them (2%)
“would still be very modest” given that the wealth of billionaires has grown at 7% a year annually since 1995.
- The number of people affected by it would be miniscule, the tax rate of them (2%)
- Some past efforts which have been beneficial:
» The Automatic exchange of bank information – have been successful in reducing offshore tax evasion by a factor of 3 over the past 10 years. - Recommendations: A global minimum tax on billionaires equal to 2% of their wealth.
» Expected Impact: This would address evasion and “Generate nearly $250 billion from less than 3,000 individuals”.
8) MAT AND AMT
A) MINIMUM ALTERNATE TAX (MAT)
- Objective of MAT
» Scenario: At times it may happen that a taxpayer, being a company, may have generated income during the year, but by taking advantage of various provisions of Income-tax Law (like exemptions deductions and depreciations, etc.) it may have reduced its tax liability or may not have paid any tax at all.- Due to increase in zero tax paying companies, MAT was introduced by the Finance Act,1987 with effect from assessment year 1988 – 89. Later on, it was withdrawn by the Finance Act, 1990 and then reintroduced by Finance Act (No. 2) 1996.
» Objective: To bring into tax net “zero tax companies” which in spite of having earned substantial book profits and having paid handsome dividends, do not pay any tax due to various concessions and incentives provided under the Income-Tax Law.
- Due to increase in zero tax paying companies, MAT was introduced by the Finance Act,1987 with effect from assessment year 1988 – 89. Later on, it was withdrawn by the Finance Act, 1990 and then reintroduced by Finance Act (No. 2) 1996.
- Section 115JB of Income Tax Act, 1961: Since the introduction of MAT, several changes have been introduced in the provisions of MAT and today it is levied on companies as per the provisions of section 115JB.
- Basic Provisions of MAT
» As per the concept of MAT, the tax liability of a company will be higher of the following
â–« Normal Tax Liability: Tax liability of the company computed as per the normal provisions of the income tax law, i.e., tax computed on the taxable income of the company by applying the tax rate applicable to the company. Tax computed in the above manner can be termed as Normal Tax Liability.
â–« MAT: Tax computed@ 18.5%(15% from AY 2020-21) (plus surcharge and cess as
applicable) on book profit. - Applicability and Non Applicability of MAT
» As per the section 115JB, every tax payer being a company is liable to pay MAT, if the income tax (including surcharge and cess) payable on the total income, computed as per the provisions of the Income-tax Act in respect of any years is less than 15% of its book profit , + surcharge + education cess + Higher Education Cess.
» Every company: Provisions of MAT are applicable to every company whether public or private and whether Indian or foreign.- Exceptions
• MAT shall not apply to any income accruing or arising to a company from life
insurance business referred to in section 115B.2 –
• MAT will not apply to a shipping income liable to tonnage taxation, i.e., tonnage taxation scheme as provided in section 115V to 115VZC.
- Exceptions
B) ALTERNATE MINIMUM TAX (AMT)
- The provisions of MAT are applicable to a corporate taxpayer only. The provisions relating to AMT are applicable to non-corporate taxpayers in a modified pattern in the form of Alternate Minimum Tax. Thus, it can be said that MAT applies to companies and AMT applies to person other than companies.
- Section 115JC and Section 115JF contains provisions relating to AMT
- AMT tax rate is 18.5%
9) INSTITUTIONS DEALING WITH DIRECT TAXES IN INDIA
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CBDT)
- It is a statutory authority functioning under the Central Board of Revenue Act, 1963. The officials of the board in their ex-officio capacity also function as a division of the ministry dealing with matters relating to levy and collection of direct taxes.
- CBDT Is a part of Department of Revenue in the Ministry of Finance. It provides input for policy and planning of direct taxes in India and is also responsible for administering of the direct taxes law through the IT department.
- Composition
- The CBDT consists of Chairman and following six members.
1. Chairman
2. Member (Income-tax)
3. Member (legislative and computerization)
4. Member (Personnel and Vigilance)
5. Member (Investigation)
6. Member (Revenue)
7. Member (Audit and Judicial)
- The CBDT consists of Chairman and following six members.
The Chairperson of CBDT is the senior most IRS(IT) serving in the country.